Αϊνστάιν – Η κατάρριψη του μύθου…

Ο Αινσταιν έκλεψε τα παντα απο τον Καραθεοδωρή.
Οςο για μαθηματικούς, φυσικούς κλπ οι αρχαίοι Ελληνες τα είπαν ολα.

Συμφωνω οτι ηταν ενα δημιουργημα των Σιωνιστων οπως και οι δυο αλλοι μαλακες που αναφερει το βιντεο αλλα δυστηχως για την ανθρωποτητα και οι 3 ηταν μεγαλα μυαλα.

Το ποσο εχει στοιχησει αυτη η απατη με την θεωρια του Αινσταιν το περιγραφει καλυτερα ο Tesla:

To Tesla, “The Theory of Relativity is just a mass of error and deceptive ideas violently opposed to the teachings of great men of science of the past and even to common sense. The theory wraps all these errors and fallacies and clothes them in magnificent mathematical garb which fascinates, dazzles and makes people blind to the underlying error. The theory is like a beggar clothed in purple whom ignorant people take for a king. Its exponents are very brilliant men, but they are metaphysicists rather than scientists.”

Writing a decade before the explosion of the atom bomb, and ignoring the space curvature data from the 1919 eclipse which supported Einstein’s idea that space was curved around large bodies such as stars, Tesla suggested that the existence of a force field would account for the same mathematical results. Thus, Tesla brazenly concluded, “Not a single one of the relativity propositions has been proved.”

“Supposing that the bodies act upon the surrounding space causing curving of the same, it appears to my simple mind that the curved spaces must react on the bodies, and producing the opposite effects, straightening out the curves. Since action and reaction are coexistent, it follows that the supposed curvature of space is entirely impossible. But, even if it existed it would not explain the motions of the bodies as observed. Only the existence of a field of force can account for the motions of the bodies as observed, and its assumption dispenses with space curvature. All literature on this subject is futile and destined to oblivion. So are all attempts to explain the workings of the universe without recognizing the existence of the ether and the indispensable function it plays in the phenomena.
My second discovery was of a physical truth of the greatest importance. As I have searched the entire scientific records in more than a half dozen languages for a long time without finding the least anticipation, I consider myself the original discoverer of this truth, which can be expressed by the statement: There is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment.”
— Nikola Tesla

“Today’s scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality.”
— Nikola Tesla

“Ether is the cause of every magnetic field. Electricity could not exist without the Ether. Ether is the medium for all EM waves from radio to gamma. Every particle in the universe is bathed in a sea of Ether, including the (so-called) electrons of atoms and plasma. Ether is how particles ‘know’ they are moving near the speed of light in a vacuum, even if they are accelerated very slowly. When the Ether gets cold enough, its properties change causing strange phenomena to both atoms and light. Using very cold temperatures is a way to isolate exactly what the Ether affects; cold temperatures are to Ether physics what accelerators are to particle physics.”
— Nikola Tesla

Παραδοξως και οι 3 αυτοι τυποι εχουν συμβαλει τα μεγιστα στον υλισμο, καθως η θεωρια του Αινσταιν αν και ο ιδιος δεν ηταν υλιστης προωθηθηκε με τετοιο τροπο που εγινε επι της ουσιας η θρησκεια του υλισμου εναντια και στην Ελληνικη θεωρια του Αιθερα-Akasha. Δεν θεωρω ομως τον Αινσταιν τοσο σκοτεινο οσο τους αλλους δυο.

Παραδοξως και οι 3 ηταν Αντιχριστιανοι αλλα και κατα της Ιουδαικης δομης της θρησκειας γενικοτερα, ετσι οπως αυτη εξελιχθηκε ομως σε αντιθεση για παραδειγμα με τον Γιουγκ ο Φροιντ που και αυτος εκλεψε πραγματα απο αλλους προσπαθησε να επιβαλει την αθεια μεσα απο την σταση του σε καποια θεματα, αλλα και μεσα απο τις πολωτικες θεωριες του οι οποιες προκαλεσαν και την συγκρουση του τελικα με τον μαθητη του Καρλ Γιουγκ.

Για το Φροιντ θα ελεγα οτι ηταν μελος καποιας σκοτεινης Σατανιστικης σεκτας και το ιδιο θα ελεγα και για τον Μαρξ. Για το Αινσταιν δεν ειμαι τοσο σιγουρος, καθως εχω την εντυπωση οτι δεν ηταν τοσο αρρωστος στο μυαλο, αλλα η εξελιξη των πραγματων και σε σχεση και με το πως η θεωρια του μετατραπηκε σε μια καταρα για την ανθρωποτητα με βαζει σε σκεψεις.